The Great Disconnection: Our Collective Dissociation from an Unbearable Reality

The Morning Ritual

You wake up and reach for your phone. Before you've even fully opened your eyes, the world's suffering floods your consciousness. Wildfires consuming entire ecosystems. Wars displacing millions. Children starving while billionaires build rockets. Democracy crumbling in real-time. The ocean choking on plastic. Animals suffering needlessly. Another mass shooting. Another species extinct. Another tipping point crossed.

By the time you've scrolled for three minutes, you've absorbed more human tragedy than your great-grandmother encountered in a lifetime. And it's only Tuesday.

So you do what any rational mind would have to do to survive: you stop feeling it. You scroll past the burning forests with the same emotional register as a recipe for banana bread. You share the article about democracy's death throes between a meme about coffee and a video of someone's cat. The pain becomes background noise, processed but not felt, acknowledged but not absorbed.

I don't see this as moral failure. It's just psychological triage. Your mind, overwhelmed by the sheer volume of suffering it's expected to hold, has begun to disconnect. Not from choice, but from necessity.

We are living through the Great Disconnection—the mass psychological exodus from a reality that has become too much for human consciousness to bear.

Stone Age Hearts, Digital Age Pain

We are the first humans in history asked to care about everything, everywhere, all at once. And we're failing spectacularly at it, not because we're broken, but because we're operating with Stone Age emotional hardware in a Digital Age reality.

Human beings evolved to function in small tribal groups. Our capacity for genuine empathy and meaningful connection maxes out at around 150 people—Dunbar's number. We're equipped to worry about our immediate community: the people we can see, touch, directly help. Our emotional systems developed to handle local problems with local solutions, where our care could translate into effective action.

Now we're expected to carry the weight of eight billion humans. And some of us have taken on the weight of the trillions of nonhuman animals those eight billion humans use and abuse every year. Every tragedy in every corner of the globe arrives in our pocket with the same urgency as a text from our best friend. The refugee crisis in Syria competes for our emotional bandwidth with the flooding in Pakistan, the famine in Yemen, the terror in Gaza, the collapse of the United States, the melting ice caps, and the homeless person we pass on our way to get groceries.

Society became interconnected faster than human emotional capacity could adapt. We built a global nervous system before we evolved global hearts. The result is a species-wide emotional overload that manifests as what psychologists call "compassion fatigue" on an individual level and what I'm calling the Great Disconnection on a collective scale.

The cruel irony runs deep. The more connected we become to global suffering, the less impact any individual can make. Your great-grandmother might have known about three families in crisis in her entire town and could actually help them—bring them soup, watch their children, offer genuine material support. You know about three million families in crisis globally and can help approximately none of them in any meaningful way. The billions and trillions of eyes become a blur. The more you care, the more powerless you feel. The more powerless you feel, the more your mind protects itself by caring less.

When Reality Becomes Unbearable

What we're witnessing isn't so much moral callousness as it is a mass psychological defense mechanism. When reality becomes unbearable, the mind has several options: fight, flight, or dissociate. Since we can't fight climate change with our fists or flee to another planet, we're left with the third option: psychological departure.

Dissociation, in clinical terms, is a disconnection from one's thoughts, feelings, memories, or sense of identity. It's what the mind does when present circumstances exceed its capacity to process and integrate experience. On an individual level, it's often a response to trauma. On a collective level, it's becoming our species' response to living in a traumatizing world.

This dissociation takes many forms, each serving the same function: protecting consciousness from realities too painful to fully experience.

We retreat into online worlds where we have agency, control, and the illusion of impact. Social media becomes a dissociative technology, allowing us to feel engaged with global issues while remaining safely removed from their actual consequences. We can "raise awareness" and "send thoughts and prayers" without the messy work of genuine presence or meaningful action.

Rather than face the overwhelming complexity of systemic breakdown, many people retreat into simpler narratives where all problems have clear causes and villains. Conspiracy theories aren't just alternative belief systems—they're psychological escape routes from unbearable reality. It's easier to believe in a shadowy cabal controlling everything than to confront the terrifying truth that no one's in control and the systems we depend on are failing randomly, chaotically, and irreversibly. Even those who control the systems and the money, cannot control what's coming.

The appeal of authoritarian leaders makes perfect sense through this lens. When reality becomes too complex to navigate, people gladly surrender their agency to someone who promises simple solutions and absolute certainty. The strongman becomes a dissociative aid, allowing followers to abdicate the exhausting work of critical thinking and moral decision-making.

Perhaps most tellingly, we're rapidly developing artificial intelligence to handle the cognitive and emotional labor we can no longer bear. We want AI to read the news and summarize it for us because we can't handle the full weight of information. We want algorithms to make decisions about what we see and don’t see because decision-making requires engaging with painful realities. We want chatbots to provide emotional support because human relationships have become too complex and demanding. We're literally outsourcing consciousness itself because being conscious has become too painful.

The Living Dead

This mass dissociation represents a form of collective suicide—not of the body, but of consciousness itself. We're becoming absent from our own lives, our own world, our own historical moment. Physically present but experientially elsewhere. Breathing but not really alive.

There's a profound tragedy embedded in this moment. We may be the last generation to witness Earth's biological abundance, the final humans to experience a relatively stable climate, the ultimate observers of what we're losing. And we're checking out just when our attention matters most.

We're dying psychologically before we die physically. "Gone" before really, truly gone. The very consciousness that could give attention to our planetary hospice, that could maintain dignity and compassion in the face of ending, is disappearing. We're becoming zombies—alive but not living, moving but not experiencing, existing but not present.

The results have been catastrophic. The challenges we face require conscious, present humans capable of clear thinking and coordinated action. Instead, we've created a population of the psychologically absent, people running on autopilot while their awareness hides in digital distractions and comforting delusions.

Anthropologist and writer Ernest Becker argued that humans build elaborate cultural defenses against the terror of death. These systems, including religious beliefs, political ideologies, and cultural values, provide a sense of meaning, purpose, and symbolic immortality, alleviating the anxiety associated with death. But we've now created defenses so effective that they've insulated us from life itself. We've become so afraid of experiencing pain that we've stopped experiencing anything fully.

The Empathy Trap

The bind we find ourselves in feels impossible to escape. The people who remain fully conscious of our predicament often become paralyzed by despair, while those who remain functional have to maintain some level of denial or dissociation. Full awareness seems incompatible with functional living, but functional living seems to require dangerous levels of disconnection from reality.

Stay fully present and risk psychological collapse. Dissociate enough to function and risk losing your humanity entirely. Neither option feels sustainable, and both feel like forms of death.

The tragedy deepens when you realize that our caring itself has become part of the problem. The more we expand our circle of concern to encompass global suffering, the more we dilute our actual capacity to help anyone. We end up caring about everything and helping nothing, which then generates guilt and hopelessness, which drives further dissociation.

We've created what I call "the empathy trap": a system where moral sensitivity leads to emotional overwhelm, which leads to psychological withdrawal, which generates guilt about not caring enough, which creates more overwhelm, driving deeper withdrawal. It's a vicious cycle that transforms our greatest human capacity—our ability to care—into a source of suffering that ultimately defeats itself.

A Third Path: The Doomee Response

But there is another way through this labyrinth of overwhelm and disconnection. I call it the Doomee path—a term for those who choose to remain consciously present with collapse and have reached a place of acceptance rather than fleeing into either denial or despair. This isn't about avoiding the pain of reality or drowning in it, but about finding a way to stay awake in hell without being consumed by the flames.

The Doomee perspective acknowledges an uncomfortable truth: we are living in planetary hospice. The patient—our interconnected web of life—is dying, and our primary task is no longer cure but care. This recognition, rather than leading to nihilism, opens up space for a different kind of meaning-making: the dignity of conscious presence during endings.

This approach differs fundamentally from the mass dissociation happening around us because it moves toward reality rather than away from it. Where dissociation numbs awareness to avoid pain, the Doomee path sharpens awareness while changing our relationship to that pain. Where dissociation scatters attention across impossible tasks, the Doomee approach focuses attention on what's actually possible. Where dissociation abandons agency in the face of powerlessness, the Doomee path finds new forms of agency within acceptance.

The distinction is crucial: both responses acknowledge that reality has become too much, but they lead in opposite directions. Healthy letting go says: "I cannot carry the weight of the world, so I will carry what I can carry well." Pathological dissociation says: "I cannot carry the weight of the world, so I will carry nothing at all."

Radical Acceptance, Local Presence

The Doomee approach requires a fundamental shift in how we understand our role in the face of global crisis. Instead of trying to save the world or carry everyone's suffering, it focuses on radical acceptance paired with local presence. You can't cure the patient, but you can offer dignified care in the time remaining.

This perspective acknowledges our evolutionary limits without shame. We're not built to care for eight billion people, and pretending otherwise creates suffering without benefit. Some might argue this is privileged thinking—that stepping back from global engagement is a luxury only available to those not directly threatened by systemic collapse. But the Doomee approach isn't about privilege; it's about strategic deployment of limited emotional resources. Even those facing direct, immediate threats can benefit from focusing their precious attention on what they can actually influence rather than dissipating it across impossible tasks. 

Rather than abandoning engagement entirely, we consciously choose our circle of care—the people, places, and causes where our attention can make a genuine difference. This isn't callousness; it's strategic compassion. The homeless person you pass every day matters more, if you help them, than the abstract millions you'll never meet and not help. The local ecosystem you can actually touch and help heal deserves your attention more than the rainforest you'll never see. Your attention is precious—spend it where it can make a difference.

This is coming for us all. Privilege may delay the outcome for some, but none of us can run from what’s coming. Privilege means having an opportunity to help. Nearly everyone is in that position at any given time.

The Practice of Unbearable Presence

So how do we stay conscious in an age when consciousness has become unbearable? How do we remain present without being overwhelmed, aware without being paralyzed, caring without being consumed?

Choose your suffering consciously. Since suffering is inevitable, we can at least decide which suffering serves something larger than our comfort. The suffering of full presence, of caring deeply for what we can actually affect, of witnessing clearly what we cannot change—this suffering has dignity and purpose. The suffering of dissociation, of floating through life unconsciously, of being absent from our own experience—this suffering serves nothing.

Practice bounded engagement. Develop specific rituals around consuming difficult information. Perhaps you check global news only once daily, at a designated time, with clear beginning and end points. Maybe you choose one day per week to engage fully with global issues, then spend the other six focused locally. Create containers that allow you to see clearly without drowning in the endless stream of crisis.

Master the art of strategic ignorance. You are not obligated to know about every tragedy, every injustice, every crisis happening globally. Your nervous system cannot process infinite suffering, and trying to do so helps no one. Choose what you will know about based on where you can actually make a difference, not on what the algorithm thinks will capture your attention.

Focus on presence over impact. Rather than asking "How can I save the world?" ask "How can I be fully present right here, right now?" Can you reduce suffering in this moment? Can you eat in good conscience? Can you offer genuine attention to someone who needs it? Can you bear witness to beauty or pain with full awareness? The meaning is complete in the moment, requiring no larger impact or future validation.

Develop emotional composting. Just as gardeners transform waste into nourishment, learn to transform overwhelming feelings into fuel for local action. When you feel helpless about global climate change, channel that energy into helping one struggling neighbor. When you're overwhelmed by species extinction, spend time tending to the wild creatures in your immediate environment. Let your grief become compost for whatever growth is still possible.

Release the savior complex. You are not responsible for saving the world. You are not equipped to carry everyone's pain. You are not failing by being human-sized in the face of planetary problems. This isn't moral failure—it's biological reality. Your job is to show up fully for your actual life, not to transcend your evolutionary limitations through sheer force of caring.

The Last Watch

We may be among the last humans capable of full consciousness—the final generation that can remain present with reality without technological mediation or psychological escape. This is both a privilege and a burden.

As the Great Disconnection accelerates, as more people retreat into digital worlds and comfortable delusions, those of us who remain conscious become increasingly rare. We are the ones who still experience what it feels like to be fully alive, fully present, fully human.

This doesn't make us better than those who dissociate—their response is as valid and necessary as ours. But it does make us different. We've chosen to maintain consciousness not because it will save the world, but because consciousness is what we are. To stay present not because presence will solve our problems, but because presence is what's happening right now.

We can't prevent the Great Disconnection any more than we can prevent climate change or societal collapse. But we can choose not to participate in it. We can remain awake while others sleep, present while others flee, conscious while others dissociate.

Not because we're stronger or better, but because this is what consciousness does when it chooses itself over its own negation. Because awareness, however painful, is still awareness. Because presence, however unbearable, is still presence. And because someone needs to maintain the capacity for witnessing, for caring, for seeing clearly what we're losing and what remains.

What Remains

The Great Disconnection and the Doomee perspective are two responses to the same impossible situation: reality has become too much for human consciousness to bear. One response is to leave. The other is to stay and learn how to bear the unbearable.

Neither choice is wrong. Both are forms of love—love for the self that cannot handle any more pain, love for the world that deserves witnesses even in its dying.

But if you're reading this, if these words resonate, if you feel the pull toward presence rather than absence—then perhaps you're called to be among the last conscious humans. The ones who stay awake during the final watch. The ones who witness with clear eyes and open hearts what it means to be human at the end of the human story.

This is the hardest spiritual path ever offered: to remain fully present with a reality that breaks your heart daily, to care deeply for a world that's dying, to maintain consciousness when consciousness has become a form of exquisite torture.

But consciousness exists. Presence is happening. Care is possible in this moment. And that's enough—not because it serves some larger purpose, but because it's what's real right now.

We cannot save the world. We cannot prevent the Great Disconnection. We cannot fix what's broken or heal what's dying.

But we can stay awake. We can remain present. We can choose consciousness over its absence, presence over escape, connection over disconnection. We can stand up for and protect those who rely entirely on us for our compassion.

That may not be enough to change anything.

But it's enough to be something.

And being, in the end, may be all consciousness ever was.

---

The Great Disconnection is not a failure of human nature—it's an inevitable response to impossible circumstances. Those who dissociate are not weak; those who remain present are not superior. We are all doing what we can with the consciousness we have, in circumstances no human was ever meant to face. The only choice that matters: Will you spend your remaining awareness hiding from reality, or present with it? Neither choice will save the world. But one of them is what consciousness looks like when it chooses itself. One of them leaves you alive and awake, if not for yourself, then to help those around you.